Structured interviews and unstructured interviews are two styles of conversations with potential employees that help you choose the best person for a given role. Each style has pros and cons, but which works better for finding the right person more quickly?
As a business owner or hiring manager, you want to use the interview method that helps you find talented people in the most efficient way possible. Fortunately, you don't have to choose just one style — you can blend the strengths of both by using the semi-structured approach.
The growing use of artificial intelligence in preparing interview questions makes it easier to structure interview questions and incorporate them into an unstructured style. Below is an explanation of each model, its strengths and weaknesses, and some ideas for taking the best of both.
A structured interview standardizes the questions asked of each potential employee. You consistently use the same set of predetermined questions, asked in the same order. You then evaluate the responses against clear, established criteria for fairness. Typical features of a structured interview include:
A structured interview gives clear benefits by making the hiring process consistent, efficient, and objectively fair. For example, by taking a structured approach, you can:
To give you an idea of what a structured interview question looks like, here are some of the most commonly asked ones:
An unstructured interview is an open conversation that takes a flexible approach, flowing naturally to explore a candidate's background and abilities. You can ask follow-up questions to probe areas of particular interest or if you uncover confusing or conflicting information.
Unstructured interview questions are ideal for capturing rich answers that address complex issues. You can adjust the conversation based on what each candidate says without being handcuffed by a set list of questions. Typical features of a structured interview include:
In preparing your interview guide, it can be helpful to see what open-ended, conversational questions look like. Here are some examples:
Unstructured interviews feel natural and can put candidates at ease. They also give you freedom in learning about topics that matter. Here are the key advantages of this interview style:
Move beyond resumes, identify true potential
Make smarter hiring decisions using objective data on candidates' strengths, work styles, and personality traits.
Book a Demo Try It FreeA structured interview approach is often used by large organizations to reduce bias and improve efficiency. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) recommends that government agencies take a structured approach to ensure fairness and consistency. Google's guide to structured interviews emphasizes that it makes for more reliable hiring decisions.
What will work best for you depends on your situation. Here are several scenarios where a structured interview offers clear advantages:
Structured interviews have some disadvantages that limit their suitability in some situations. For example, you may:
The conversational approach of an unstructured interview and its ability to quickly adapt to the direction of the conversation are clear advantages. This is especially true for roles requiring in-depth discussions of experience and skills, or assessing candidates' potential and fit with the company culture. It is ideal for finding talent for creative roles, positions that require interpersonal finesse, and to find strategic thinkers.
Here are some examples of when an unstructured interview might be useful:
Some of the challenges around unstructured interviews should be kept in mind, such as:
Both structured and unstructured interview styles have their advantages. Here is a compilation of the key differences to help you choose the right approach for your situation.
Interview Type | Structured | Unstructured |
---|---|---|
Definition | A formal interview with a fixed list of questions to be asked in a specific order | A flexible, open-ended talk that flows according to the interviewer's interests and judgment |
Question format | Standardized for all candidates | Spontaneous and varied based on the candidate |
Flexibility | Not flexible | Highly dynamic |
Consistency | The same for all candidates | Inconsistent, with every candidate having a different experience |
Bias reduction | Minimizes bias | Greater risk for bias and discrimination |
Preparation time | Time-consuming prep is needed | Informality means you can wing it and talk “off the cuff” |
Predictive validity | Proven to predict job performance | Less reliable in forecasting success |
Evaluation | Easy and more efficient | Time-consuming and more subjective |
Candidate experience | Can feel impersonal | Feels relaxed and natural |
Best suited for | Hiring large numbers, entry-level positions, and roles in regulated fields | Ideal for leadership, strategic, creative, and specialized roles, and in situations where cultural fit matters |
Making the right choice between structured vs. unstructured interview styles depends on several factors:
The answers to these and other questions will drive your choice.
Structured interviews take expertise and time to set up, but they will help with faster, more efficient, and less biased decision making. Numerous studies have found that structured interviews are superior in providing better hiring results.
Unstructured interviews, with their flexible and conversational approach, also have their strengths and are useful in certain situations.
Structured interviewing has proven effective in predicting on-the-job performance, reducing bias, and making the hiring process more efficient. However, many organizations continue to take an unstructured approach. People prefer the familiar, and managers often like to “go with their gut.”
The biggest myth around structured interviews is that they are too rigid and limiting. Possibly the biggest impediment is that it takes time and expertise to craft a structured interview script, both of which are scarce. You need training to use it well and discipline to stick to it.
As Google's hiring guide states, a structured approach is worth the effort in the quality of hire, fairness, and efficiency it provides.
A semi-structured interview is a way to get the benefits of both approaches. Creating a semi-structured guide gives you the structure needed for efficiency and fairness, but offers some flexibility with open-ended questions and follow-ups that let the interviewer dive deeper into a topic to understand the nuances of the interviewee's experience, style, and personality, or to uncover vital information about an unexpected topic.
While AI can be helpful in constructing a semi-structured guide, you're better off using specialized software like that offered by Hire Success® to ensure compliance with the legalities of pre-employment testing and to choose questions that are scientifically based to get the information you want.
Hire Success® helps you reap all the benefits of both structured and unstructured interview models to create a kind of “superstructured” interview. Here's how:
It's best to keep in mind your business's needs and objectives when deciding which type of style is best for your interviewing process. Choosing the Hire Success® interviewing system can help you combine the advantages of structured vs. unstructured interviews.
Want to know more about our hiring system? Get a personalized walk-through of our interviewing solutions.
Read the latest employment resources from Hire Success
You are hiring for a pivotal leadership role. One candidate grabs your attention. They have what you’re looking for: confidence, ambition, and the assertive style of a go-getter and a winner. A thought lingers, though — will they work well with your team? Will they pair disruption with empowerment?
Kelly Cantwell
The hiring process has entered a new era. In today’s competitive job market, speed and a tech-savvy strategy give you the edge in finding the best talent. At a time of skill shortages, low unemployment, and the rapid rise of AI usage, by both employers and candidates, the whole hiring process is changing quickly. Making your hiring process more efficient and engaging will improve your ability to source and screen candidates.
Kelly Cantwell
Companies are taking a closer look at the skills they need employees to have, and how to best assess those skills. Having a degree or certification in a certain area is not an accurate indicator of candidate capability. This new awareness has led to what Harvard Business Review calls a “reset in hiring practices.”
Kelly Cantwell
From us to your inbox weekly.